Teaching Writing in Theory and
Practice
A Study of Ways of Working with Writing in the 9th Grade
Emelie Ahlsén and Nathalie Lundh
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to take a closer look at how teachers work with
writing and to examine some theories on the teaching of writing. Five teachers in two
schools are included in order to get an insight in teachers’ practical work with EFL
writing. This has been done through classroom observations and interviews. The results
show that all teachers seem to use aspects from several theories. The results also show
that the teachers’ level of awareness of theories on teaching writing varies.
Keywords
Compulsory school, EFL (English as a Foreign Language), Genre Writing, Process
Writing Writing assignments, Writing theory
Teaching Writing
“A simplistic view of writing would assume that written language is simply the graphic
representation of spoken language…” (Brown, 2001:335). Writing is more complex
than this; hence writing pedagogy is important, as Brown states by claiming that writing
is “as different from speaking as swimming is from walking” (2001:335).
This is supported and developed by Hedge, who states that writing is more than
producing accurate and complete sentences and phrases. She states that writing is about
guiding students to: “produce whole pieces of communication, to link and develop
information, ideas, or arguments for a particular reader or a group of readers…”
(2005:10). Therefore effective writing requires several things: a high degree of
organization regarding the development and structuring of ideas, information and
arguments. Furthermore, Hedge mentions features such as: a high degree of accuracy,
complex grammar devices, a careful choice of vocabulary and sentence structures in
order to create style, tone and information appropriate for the readers of one’s written
text (2005:7). All these points make the teaching of writing a complex matter, since all
this should be taken into consideration for efficient learning of writing strategies.
Cushing Weigle looks at the writing ability from several perspectives. For instance, she
views it as a social and cultural phenomenon and as a cognitive activity (2002:14).
These two aspects are briefly presented below.
Theory: Interviews
McDonough and McDonough write that “interviewing is a very basic research tool in
social science” (1997:182) and explains further that there are different kinds of
interviews to use in research; structured, semi-structured and unstructured. Cohen,
Manion and Morrison present a different categorization, using Patton’s (1980) interview
types: Informal Conversational Interview, Interview Guide Approach, Standardized
Open-ended Interviews and Closed Qualitative Interviews. (2007: 235)
The semi-structured interview allows for more flexibility than the structured one, but is
easier to analyse than the unstructured interview. Therefore the semi-structured
interview is our chosen method. Furthermore, using the terminology of Patton (1980;
see above), this method is a mix of the Interview Guide Approach and the Standardized
Open-ended Interviews. The questions in our interviews were designed and structured
in advance although there was room for follow-up questions depending on the
interviewee’s answers (appendix 3).
Eva (Appendix 5)
6.2.1 Observation
Eva started the lesson by a short introduction of the writing assignment. She asked the
students to write a presentation of an organisation, and gave an example by referring to
a page in the students’ textbooks (Wings) about Greenpeace. There, the students were
able to read a presentation and were given some guidelines of what to think about when
writing such a text. It seemed as if it was an assignment of writing a factual text. After
this, the students were asked to begin writing. They were free to choose whether they
wanted to work by themselves or in small groups. The time limit was three forty-minute
lessons. During the rest of the observed lesson Eva circulated in the class to make sure
that all students had chosen a topic. At some points students asked for help with
vocabulary, and every time Eva stated that the most important thing was that they
should use English expressions, not just translate Swedish ones word by word. One
group asked if they could interpret some lyrics instead of doing the given assignment.
They wanted to do it orally. Eva agreed to this and explained this to the observer by
referring to her teaching philosophy; encourage the students’ creativity and their own
ideas at all times. The assignment originally given did not seem to matter anymore.
6.2.2 Interview
Many times throughout the interview Eva comes back to what she finds to be the most
important thing when it comes to teaching writing; she wants her students to find the
fun in writing and she strives to stimulate their imagination through her assignments.
She believes that writing in the 9th grade should be free and that the most important
thing for the students is to learn how to use their best English, with as few Swedish
expressions as possible. Eva mentions that she presents writing assignments by giving
the students short instructions for each assignment. She writes them down on the white-
board and gives examples from the textbook. She explains that she does not want to
give too many instructions because then the students might focus too much on what the
purpose is. To Eva the most important thing in teaching writing is that the students find
the ‘flow’ in their writing. The structure and the grammar come later, according to Eva.
The actual writing assignments that Eva uses are varied: essays, retelling stories,
descriptions and presentations are some of the activities that she mentions. She wants
the assignment to have a multiple purpose; on the one hand it should give the students
the opportunity to practice their grammar and vocabulary, and on the other hand it
should give opportunities to self-reflection and self-awareness. Whatever the
assignment is, Eva believes that it is important to present it within some kind of a
context. Sometimes she shows a film, and other times the class reads a text before
starting the writing, in order to create understanding for the assignment among the
students.
When asked about theories, Eva makes it clear that she does not believe much in
theories. She mentions that she has heard of process writing, but that she would not like
to use it herself. She has not heard of genre writing before, and when the interviewer
explains the theory to her, she says that she might use it if she was to teach English at
Upper Secondary School and that she feels that it will be too early to introduce it in 9th
grade. She comes back to her earlier claim that writing should be free and adds that one
should not provide students with too narrow frames in writing assignments. She
believes in the students’ inner strength and creativity rather than sticking to frameworks
and reproducing sample texts. Eva says that all assignments are good for the students, as
long as they have fun.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar